Geosocial networking apps (GSN; e.g., Tinder, Grindr) have quickly increased in appeal, showing associations with greater intimate risk-taking. This research desired to tell apart between dangers connected with intensive partner-seeking (for example., individuals searching for casual intercourse usually across numerous venues) and dangers connected with particular venues ( ag e.g., GSNs, dating websites, offline tasks). Expanding upon a literature predominantly centered on the populace of males who’ve intercourse with men (MSM), we recruited a wider number of intimate identities. A convenience test of 3180 individuals through the U.S. (18вЂ“75 years of age, 69% feminine, 75% Caucasian, 68% heterosexual) finished an anonymous, cross-sectional paid survey. Logistic regressions yielded adjusted odds ratios showcasing the initial links between each predictor and intimate risk-taking. MSM/WSW indicators, level of partner-seeking and certain venuesвЂ”particularly GSN useвЂ”emerged as robust predictors of intimate danger, increasing the likelihood of reporting all six results examined: (1) having three or even more intercourse lovers within the last few 12 months, (2) having hookups within the last few 2 months, (3) having hookups involving liquor or (4) medication use, (5) condomless sex with brand brand brand new lovers within the last few 2 months, and (6) ever having had an infection that is sexually transmitted. Both online and offline methods of partner-seeking also contributed significant risk, suggesting that specific venues like GSN apps could be used as methods of targeting higher-risk behaviors although a large portion of risk originated from the proclivities of the individuals seeking casual sex. The outcomes additionally highlight the significance of going beyond MSM when handling risk that is sexual.
That is a preview of registration content, log on to always check access.
Purchase article that is single
Immediate access to your article PDF that is full.
Price includes VAT for Moldova
Contribute to journal
Immediate online access to all the presssing problems from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.
This is actually the price that is net. Fees become determined in checkout.
Beymer, M. R., Weiss, R. E., Bolan, R. K., Rudy, E. T., Bourque, L. B., Rodriguez, J. P., & Morisky, D. E. (2014). Sex on need: Geosocial phone that is networking and chance of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of males who possess intercourse with males in Los Angeles County. Intimately Transmitted Infections,90, 567вЂ“572. .
Jenness, S. M., Neaigus, A., Hagan, H., Wendel, T., Gelpi-Acosta, C., & Murrill, C. S. (2010). Reconsidering the world-wide-web being an /STD danger for males who’ve intercourse with males. AIDS and Behavior,14, 1353вЂ“1361. /p>
Kerr, Z. Y., Pollack, L. M., Woods, W. J., Blair, J., & Binson, D. (2014). Utilization of multiple intercourse venues and prevalence of danger behavior: distinguishing high-risk males who have intercourse with guys. Arces of Sexual Behavior,44, 443вЂ“451.
Landovitz, R. J., Tseng, C. H., Weissman, M., Haymer, M., Mendenhall, B., Rogers, https://besthookupwebsites.org/it/aisle-review/ K., & Shoptaw, S. (2013). Epidemiology, intimate danger behavior, and prevention methods of males that have intercourse with males making use of GRINDR in l . a ., Ca. Journal of Urban Health,90, 729вЂ“739.
Legate, N., & Rogge, R. D. (2019). Distinguishing basic classes of intimate orientation with latent profile analysis: Developing the multivariate intimate orientation category system. Arces of Sexual Behavior,48, 1403вЂ“1422..
Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of starting up intimate actions and psychological responses among U.S. students. Arces of Sexual Behavior,41, 1219вЂ“1229. .
Lewnard, J. A., & Berrang-Ford, L. (2014). Internet-based partner selection and danger for unprotected rectal intercourse in intimate encounters among males who possess intercourse with guys: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Intimately Sent Infections,90, 290вЂ“296. .
Liau, A., Millett, G., & Marks, G. (2006). Meta-analytic study of on the web sex-seeking and risk that is sexual among males that have intercourse with males. Intimately Sent Diseases,33, 576вЂ“584. .
Macapagal, K., Moskowitz, D. A., Li, D. H., CarriГіn, A., Bettin, E., Fisher, C. B., & Mustanski, B. (2018). Hookup software usage, intimate behavior, and intimate wellness among adolescent males who possess intercourse with males in america. Journal of Adolescent Health,62(6), 708вЂ“715. .
Mustanski, B. S. (2007). Are intimate partners met online associated with /STI risk behaviours? Retrospective and diary that is daily in conflict. AIDS Care,19, 822вЂ“827.